?

Log in

June 2016   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Barack Obama

Old Analyses of New Paradigms

Posted on 2008.11.21 at 20:32
One of the things I do on the Internet, and have done for years, is manage the Larry Niven Mailing List, "larryniven-l @larryniven-l.org." We don't restrict our discussions to the works of Niven. We're Sci-Fi geeks, and we talk about all sorts of subjects, including, of course, Star Trek. And every time Trek is discussed, some of the economically-conservative folks on the list spout off about how Star Trek's "United Federation of Planets" is communist. It isn't. It's been explicitly stated that it isn't. In fact, the economics of the Federation is a science-fictional projection, just like "Warp Drive" and "Phasers" and "Vulcans." Gene Roddenberry said in numerous interviews that a new economic model has evolved by Star Trek's time, making it unnecessary for people to slave away at a job, making it possible for everyone to have what they need to live and live well, and freeing people to devote themselves to improving their own lives and society instead of just keeping a roof over their head and food on their table. You can't define Star Trek's economics as Communist, Capitalist, or an Anarcho-Syndicalist Commune. It's something new that we can't imagine now, and any attempt to judge it by the standards of some known economic model are doomed to failure.

I've been thinking about this a lot watching news coverage of Barack Obama's transition. The Punditocracy has again and again criticized various moments in the transition as bungles, stumbles, or amatuerish errors. They started with Conservative Republican Butthead Joe Scarbrough (*Special note to  tariana: he's not a butthead because he's a Conservative Republican. He's a butt-head because he's a butthead, and I have no doubt he'd agree with the characterization.</span>) who called Rahm Emanuel's on-camera discussion of the pros and cons of accepting the post of White House Chief of Staff a gigantic and amateurish bungle two days after the election, and continues with expressions of bafflement over the public discussion of the negotiations with Senator and President Clinton over vetting and conflicts of interest as they work out how to make her Secretary of State.

The Press apparently covered an entire campaign based on the premise that this is not your father's politics, without ever realizing that this is not your father's politics. It is, rather, a vastly more open, honest, transparent kind of politics, where as much as possible does happen in the public view.

I lived from 1981 to 1986 in Germany, and more than once, during the beginnings of the Iran Contra scandal, I was asked by puzzled Europeans, "What is this American insistance on doing your dirty laundry in public?" I would always answer, "We do our dirty laundry in public because, afterwards, everyone can see that it's clean." 

There's not going to be much room for anybody to say that some sneaky back-room crap went into these appointments, because we're seeing all of it. 

It's not a bungle. It's a new kind of politics, and the old kind of analysis just won't cover it.

Comments:


dome36
dome36 at 2008-11-22 10:14 (UTC) (Link)
I agree.

If something is discuss at the open, it will be easier to the public to understand choices and the reasons behind those choices.

Dome
scribhneoir1
scribhneoir1 at 2008-11-22 15:36 (UTC) (Link)
there is something inherently refreshing about political discussions being out in the open as such, it allows little room for the cynical political doubletalk.
Ashaherazade
ashaherazade at 2008-11-23 06:59 (UTC) (Link)
Yes!

Whether you agree with every choice or not even the Right Wing naysayers are admitting his choices are not ideologues or (generally) radically partisan {Note I'm in Illinois 5 days a week so yes I realize *exactly* how much this doesn't apply to Rahm - but that said he still appears to be extremely committed to Obama not just himself}. What I personally like is that he seems to be choosing people from outside his personal circle - unlike the Current Occupant who chose people based on whether he knew them not on whether they knew the job they were being tasked with - and who are apparently really truly intelligent.

I still worry about the confirmation hearings on HRC, mainly because of Billy Boy. Hopefully she'll get a Halti Collar and short leash fitted for him before then. Of course I would have put a choke chain on him long before now so he should be glad he has her and not me.

And, btw, the Indian subcontinent hasn't any issues with wondering why Americans air their political dirty laundry. After all they make us look positively Victorian in not mentioning 'unmentionables' of the political sort :-)
Previous Entry  Next Entry